GLF Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 Given the state of Lake Michigan, I would like to see Michigan go back to the 5 fish per species limit. I am not sure if the reductions in stockings by all of the surrounding states will be enough. I would rather take a risk on reducing the salmon population to much than have it end up like Lake Huron. Some people struggle to catch the 3 fish limit?I guess we will have to wait and see if the reductions are enough to save the lake.Whats everyone's thoughts on the 3 fish limit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Arend Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 Out of the states that border Lake Michigan, Michigan is the only state with a 5 fish limit only 3 of one species. Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin have a 5 fish limit in combination or of one species other then Lake Trout.Why??????????? I feel we should do as every one else that borders the lake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixshooter Posted July 8, 2006 Share Posted July 8, 2006 I agree. Especially for KINGS. It is ludicrous. 5 Salmon, since half the people can't tell the difference between a king and a coho anywho....they can keep it 3 steelies and 2 lakers don't care much about that.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just One Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 I've got a hard time catching 1. I dont know what I would do if I caught 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLF Posted July 21, 2006 Author Share Posted July 21, 2006 I've got a hard time catching 1. I dont know what I would do if I caught 5. I am guessing we would have a fish fry at your house Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now